Dedicated to General Qassem Soleimani, Hero of the Free World assassinated by the US Terror State on 03.01.2020
The chaotic war game of US strikes against those who dare to stand still is gone, and the US Terror State has to acknowledge it. The US Terror State got so used to commit all kinds of atrocities all the time and all over the planet that, now, they are having a very hard time swallowing the new reality.
The time has come for the evil authorities of the United States to realize the Islamic Republic of Iran’s capabilities in a greater extent of global geography, adopt a principled approach, and pull the forces of their terrorist army out of the region as soon as possible.”--- Iranian General Mohammad Hossein Baqeri
The US committed an outrageous atrocity against those who really fought ISIS, showing, once and for all, in which side the US really is: ISIS side. I know, this is not news for those who follow the subject for real. There's plenty of evidence to prove the US created, trained, financed and spread ISIS over Syria and Iraq.
Second, why, on 17 September 2016, U.S.-led Coalition delivered 37 airstrikes over the city of Deir-ez-Zor, in eastern Syria, killing between 90 and 106 Syrian Army soldiers and wounding more than 110, destroying a big part of the airport and military base infrastructure and destroying scores of military equipment (including Syrian aircrafts)?
Why did the US bomb Deir-ez-Zor in synchrony with ISIS advances on the ground against an ISIS-sieged Syrian city? The USA had asked Russian permission to "bomb ISIS positions" several kilometers south from that city but, somehow, US super-hyper-technological war machine, with plenty of fancy high tech, missed the target not by several meters, but by several kilometers? And while US kept missing their target (from 3:55 p.m. to 4:56 p.m., Damascus time), the USA-Russian communication channels where all coincidentally off, so Russian authorities had no way to inform the primitive US Air Force that they were missing their target with an error of several kilometers and that, "oops", they were hitting the only Syrian-held city in an ISIS ocean."
--- from a previous article of mine
The US committed an outrageous atrocity in the most vicious manner, bombing someone legally present in Iraq, who was there to participate in political negotiations to take place the next day with the Iraqi government. Negotiations supposedly supported by the US! The US simply framed Soleimani in the most wicked and dishonest manner!
Soleimani arrived in Iraq at my request to receive a response from Saudi Arabia to Iran’s peace initiative. Trump killed a foreign officer on a territory he is supposed to protect and an envoy of peace who landed at the request of the Prime Minister”
--- Iraqi Prime Minister Abdel Mahdi
No matter how many times Trump, the US administration and Western MSM invert reality to call General Soleimani a terrorist about to commit terrorist attacks against US Army personnel, the very opposite is true.
Before Trump assassinated him, Qasem Soleimani led Iran’s fight against ISIS. So why does Western media insist he was a terrorist? pic.twitter.com/BpJBII7ULS— In the NOW (@IntheNow_tweet) January 10, 2020
(backup video here on VK, just in case Twitter decides to censor this tweet).
Facebook might censor it, but General Soleimani fought the long defensive war against Saddam Hussein's Iraq and against its Western supporters (like the US, the UK or Germany), which ended with US Terror State shooting down an Iranian civilian aircraft, killing 290 civilians (274 passengers, of whom 66 were children, and 16 crew members).
General Soleimani fought in 2006 in Lebanon, defending Lebanese from Israeli aggression.
General Soleimani participated in the 2016 reconquest of Aleppo city against al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda-linked organizations (known in Western newspeak as "Free Syria Army").
(Flags of ISIS, al-Qaeda and the "Free Syrian Army" side by side. For more footage, click here)
After having murdered General Soleimani in a clear act of state terrorism, the US administration, fearing retaliation, opted to bluff, threatening to bomb 52 Iranian cultural sites "very fast and very hard", and so on.
In truth, the US administration had only 3 options, all of them incredibly unpleasant. The choices were:
1 - To obliterate Iran with nukes as the only way to stop Iran, triggering WW3 and the end of life on Earth (unacceptable, even for North American warmongers);
2 - To fight a conventional war with Iran, which would be a stupid decision, as Iran just showed it can blow up US military bases with extreme accuracy, while the US can't intercept a single Iranian missile. The US would be already defeated before trying to launch suicidal land operations against very well-trained and very well-experienced Axis of Resistance. A conventional war would, therefore, mean 3 things: major humiliation for the US, damaging its (dirty) reputation; the slaughter of US soldiers in Syria and Iraq; the US forced to leave the region after a military defeat.
3 - To not react to the Iranian airstrikes against the 2 military bases and acknowledge a minor humiliation; to start planning a less humiliating and peaceful withdrawal of its troops from the region.
The US kind of chose option 3.
But, as the gangster organization it is, the US administration had to come with some dirty bloody trick, copypasting what Israeli did in Syria in the past. In 2018, Israel employed the dirty tactic of hiding Israeli F-16 jets behind a Russian Il-20 plane in order to induce a response from the Syrian anti-aircraft defense system.
This time, according to Russian Foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, six North American F-35 were possibly flying over Iranian airspace at the time the Iranian anti-aircraft defense system accidentally shot down the Ukranian 737. CIA Officer Giraldi and others go even further, suggesting the US might have "hacked Ukrainian transponder to provoke Iran shootdown".
There are no coincidences in the realm of geopolitical chessboard! The tragedy occurred the same night Iran attacked the two US military bases in Iraq, and only a few hours after, when nervous Iranians were on high-alert waiting for the possibility of being attacked by the US Terror Army.
As was well-proved in 1988, when the US shot down Iran Air's 655 commercial flight and killed 290 civilians, the US is perfectly fine with human death, human tragedy, and human suffering, and don't even apologize for its horrendous crimes:
One quote from George H. W. Bush shows the imperial hubris he embodied.— Moderate Rebels (@Moderate_Rebels) December 1, 2018
On July 3, 1988, the US shot down an Iranian civilian airliner, massacring all 290 passengers, including 66 kids.
Bush responded saying, "I will never apologize for the USA. I don't care what the facts are" pic.twitter.com/0LC4K44w6D
In total opposition to the US administration and its psychopathic mindset, there's a peaceful humanist Iran whose administration indirectly informed the North Americans 2 hours prior to the Iranian airstrikes against its two military bases in Iraq, in order to avoid the death of US/NATO terrorist soldiers present in those bases!
The US, not only is fine with air strikes and the killing of dozens of Syrian civilians several times per week for the past many years (to mention only one example), but actually is also fine with the shootdown of a civilian aircraft. Guilty in the past of shotting down a civilian aircraft, now the US Terror Air Force might have led the Iranian anti-aircraft defense system to do the same, by flying F-35 over Iran!
Bravo terrorist USA, so much killing just to try to damage Iran's image in the eyes of Western sheep-like humans who, anyway, are already wrongly sure than Iran is the land of ultimate evil!
Stubborn suicidal US understood it can no longer attack Iran without triggering a huge humiliation for itself in the region and the need for a Vietnam-styled withdrawal of its troops in order to avoid the death of many US soldiers.
"Qassem Suleimani was killed as part of a broader strategy of deterring challenges by US foes that also applies to China and Russia, the US secretary of state."
Morally corrupted and politically prostituted Europe doesn't like what it sees, but obediently acquiesces to the decisions of stubborn USA, knowing that US's secret sleeping cells, if necessary, can be activated to punish Europeans with false flag terrorist attacks (read: NATO's Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, by Daniele Ganser). And European prostituted politicians know how much and how well they have worked to achieve what they have now: a Europe economically over-dependent from the US, politically controlled by the US and military occupied by the US.
In this scenario, news like this one are perfectly normal: Trump DID threaten Europe with 25% tariff on car exports over Iran.
Interesting, right? It was the US that abandoned the 5+1 agreement on the Iranian nuclear deal (which was already unfair for Iran). The US, a few days ago, committed a terrorist attack and killed the most important Iranian general.
Yet, the unreliable and terrorist US threatens its European vassal states with a 25% tariff on car exports if they do not wage diplomatic war with Iran! What did Iran do wrong? Iran has the right to exist! To embargo, sanction, threaten, isolate, starve or bomb Iranian citizens is absolutely wrong and against International Law! Iran is the bullied victim here, and the US is clearly the bully!
But will pseudo-humanitarian Europeans side with the Iranian victim and distance themselves from US aggressor? Of course they won't!
The Iraqi position also immediately produced presidential threats and tweets about “sanctions like they have never seen,” with the implication that the U.S. was more than willing to wreck the Iraqi economy if it did not get its way. The latest threat to emerge involves blocking Iraq access to its New York federal reserve bank account, where international oil sale revenue is kept, creating a devastating cash crunch in Iraq’s financial system that might indeed destroy the Iraqi economy. If taking steps to ruin a country economically is not considered warfare by other means it is difficult to discern what might fit that description."--- Philip Giraldi
Luís Garcia, Thailand
READ ALSO: [updated]
- How are Iran and the “Axis of the Resistance” affected by the US assassination of Soleimani?, by Elijah Magnier
- Pompeo to Iraq: If You Kick Us Out, We Will Bury You, by Mike Whitney
- Our beloved General: Hajj Qassem Soleimani, by Shabbir Hassanally
- Who Targeted Ukraine Airlines Flight 752? Iran Shot It Down But There May Be More to the Story, by Philip Giraldi
- A New Definition of Warfare - Sanctions can be more deadly than bullets, by Philip Giraldi
- The Murder Of Qassem Soleimani Will Deter No One, on Moon of Alabama
- Immediate US withdrawal due to its violation of the agreement and Iraq sovereignty, by Elijah Magnier
- The United States: a Record-Holder in Political Assassinations, by Wayne Madsen
- ‘Targeted and governmental terrorism’: Iran slams US for threat against Soleimani successor, RT
- Pompeo: New US Policy Authorized Drones Strikes on Russian, Chinese Leaders, by Gordon Duff
- An Army for Hire: Trump Wants to Make Money by Renting Out American Soldiers, by Philip Giraldi